One huge problem with MAFS this season

MAFS drama fatigue is real and fans are feeling it. There was a time when watching Married At First Sight Australia felt like a shared national ritual. This year, something feels very different.

There was a time when watching Married At First Sight Australia felt like a shared national ritual.

Group chats lit up in real time. Phones were balanced on knees during dinner parties.

Entire friendships were briefly fuelled by outrage over questionable grooms and flying wine

glasses.

This year, something feels different.

The drama is still there. If anything, there is more of it. But instead of that addictive can’t-look-away feeling, many long-time viewers are describing something closer to emotional

fatigue. Episodes are piling up unwatched. People are saying they will “catch up later” and then quietly realising they do not really want to.

It is not that audiences have stopped caring. It is that caring suddenly feels like hard work.

When the story stops making sense

Part of the shift comes down to how the storytelling is landing. Relationships seem to swing

from full-blown hostility to cosy friendship almost overnight, with very little sense of what

actually happened in between.

Former MAFS contestant, season 11’s Lauren Dunn believes changing cast behaviour and social media use are a big part of that confusion.

“In previous seasons we had really clear expectations and contracts,” she tells news.com.au.

“We were asked not to hang out off camera and not to use social media in ways that would

spoil the storyline. Those rules exist for a reason. If people are resolving things off screen and then suddenly appearing fine on camera, the audience is left wondering what they missed.”

Former MAFS participant Lauren Dunn says changing cast behaviour has made this new season of MAFS suffer.
Former MAFS participant Lauren Dunn says changing cast behaviour has made this new season of MAFS suffer.

She says this year feels harder to follow.

“You’ll see people hating each other on screen and then hanging out together on social media. That completely breaks the storyline for viewers. It makes it confusing.”

Reality television commentator and former MAFS producer Alexandria Funnell says the challenge is often less about manipulation and more about the unpredictability of real people.

“Editing is the art of making sense of nonsense,” she says. “Sometimes you are trying to build a coherent story out of hundreds of hours of footage where participants are constantly shifting their perspective or rewriting their own version of events.”

When audiences cannot track the emotional logic, she says, they begin to disengage from the stakes.

Funnell says viewers are also far more aware now of how narrative construction works behind the scenes.

“There is a growing media literacy around reality TV,” she says. “Audiences understand they are watching a shaped story, not just a social experiment. That awareness can make them more critical when the storytelling feels messy or emotionally inconsistent.”

When drama stops feeling entertaining

At the same time, the intensity of the conflict itself appears to be landing differently this season.

Clinical and counselling psychologist, Kerstin Anderson-Ridge tells news.com.au viewers are no longer simply watching reality television from a distance. Many are forming strong emotional responses to what unfolds on screen.

Former MAFS producer Alexandria Funnell: “Editing is the art of making sense of nonsense.”
Former MAFS producer Alexandria Funnell: “Editing is the art of making sense of nonsense.”
Clinical and counselling psychologist, Kerstin Anderson-Ridge. Picture: Supplied
Clinical and counselling psychologist, Kerstin Anderson-Ridge. Picture: Supplied

“They are having quite a relational experience with it,” she explains. “They form opinions, take sides, feel frustrated and often carry the emotional tone of what they have watched into the rest of their evening.”

In real life, she says, people instinctively look for repair after conflict. An apology. A shift. Some sense of growth. When television repeatedly presents arguments without resolution, it can leave audiences feeling unsettled, even if they cannot immediately articulate why.

“I often describe the journey as curiosity, then investment, then fatigue and finally disengagement,” she says. “It is not that viewers stop caring. It is that they have been emotionally ‘on’ for too long without any real payoff.”

Over time, she says, that experience can begin to feel like emotional labour rather than entertainment.

After a full day managing their own relationships, work pressures and responsibilities, many people simply do not have the capacity to absorb another layer of heightened conflict during what is meant to be their downtime.

Inside the pressure to keep conflict alive

Dunn says that during her own season, once an issue became central to the storyline, it was

revisited repeatedly.

“Once something becomes a storyline, producers will keep asking you about that topic,” she says. “That is just how the show works. You are guided to talk about what is happening in your relationship.”

At the same time, she stresses that contestants still have agency.

MAFS season 11 contestant Lauren is happy to give fans of the show a peek behind the curtain.
MAFS season 11 contestant Lauren is happy to give fans of the show a peek behind the curtain.

“Production might guide things, but you still have free will. You can say no. People often blame production after they see their edit, but from my experience what went to air was

what actually happened.”

Funnell describes the producer’s role as bringing existing tensions to the surface rather than manufacturing them.

“They are like the observant friend at a tense dinner party encouraging people to actually say what has been building under the surface,” she says.

The social media effect

Another shift reshaping the viewing experience is the erosion of secrecy.

Earlier seasons relied on strict confidentiality rules to preserve suspense around commitment ceremonies and relationship turning points. Now contestants’ social media activity can offer real-time clues about alliances or outcomes before episodes even air.

“That loss of mystery absolutely affects how invested audiences feel,” Dunn says. “If viewers can see what is happening on TikTok or Instagram, they are less likely to sit through an hour’s worth of TV and ads waiting to find out.”

Funnell believes the franchise is adapting through companion content and multi-platform storytelling that responds quickly to audience speculation.

“The audience is no longer passive,” she says. “They are analysing the narrative, debating it online and emotionally inserting themselves into it.”

When escapism starts to feel heavy

13 seasons in, how many more tearful brides can we take?
13 seasons in, how many more tearful brides can we take?

For many viewers, the biggest shift this year is tonal. The balance between drama and emotional payoff appears to have tipped too far.

Funnell admits that even as a long-time fan, she has found this season more draining than

entertaining.

“When entertainment becomes another source of emotional heaviness, it stops functioning as escapism,” she says. “People are already carrying a lot. Watching relentless conflict can start to feel like an extension of that stress.”

She believes the tone of this season has felt particularly intense.

“There has been a noticeable lack of light and shade,” she says. “Reality TV traditionally works when viewers can move between humour, connection, tension and growth. When the emotional register sits at high conflict for too long, it can become draining rather than entertaining.”

Anderson-Ridge sees similar patterns in her clinical work and says repeated exposure to high-conflict dynamics can activate a stress response.

“Our nervous systems are highly responsive to perceived conflict and threat, even through a screen,” she explains. “Sustained exposure to hostility or volatility can leave people feeling agitated, flat or emotionally exhausted afterwards.”

A format at a turning point

The show's lost its shock value – despite their faces.
The show’s lost its shock value – despite their faces.

Despite widespread complaints of burnout, ratings remain strong. Viewers seem caught in a familiar push and pull between fascination and fatigue.

“That tension between dissatisfaction and continued viewing is fascinating,” Funnell says. “It

shows how powerful the format still is, but also how important it is for producers to recalibrate the balance between spectacle and meaning.”

Dunn believes restoring balance will be key to the show’s future.

“People do want drama,” she says. “But there needs to be more belief that participants are genuinely there for love.”

Funnell agrees long-running reality franchises must continue to evolve.

“Reality television works best when audiences feel entertained rather than depleted,” she says.

For now, many viewers are quietly renegotiating their relationship with the genre. They are still watching. Still talking. Still curious about what will happen next.

But increasingly, they are also noticing how they feel afterwards. And this season, for a lot of them, that feeling is simply tired.