Kyle Sandilands issues BLUNT demand to KIIS bosses outside court

Kyle Sandilands issues blunt demand to KIIS bosses outside court and tells Australians to watch what happens next

Kyle Sandilands has revealed he has not spoken to former co-host Jackie ‘O’ Henderson and demanded he be put back on the radio ahead of their joint court mention.

Sandilands made the comments outside the Federal Court in Sydney on Friday amid civil cases brought by both stars against former employer ARN, owner of KIIS 106.5.

Confronted with a thick media pack outside court, Sandilands made clear that the radio stars are currently not communicating.

‘I haven’t spoken to Jackie,’ he said.

Sandilands also made a series of veiled comments about his ARN bosses and former co-host Henderson, talking about ‘truth’ and ‘media dynamics’.

‘I can talk to anyone – it’s the media business. One day you hate someone, the next day you’re best friends,’ he said.

Sandilands said the public should not read everything at face value as the dispute plays out.

‘If you know how these procedures work, there’s strategy and then there’s truth, and once we get inside, you’ll get all the answers out and the truth will raise its head.’

Kyle Sandilands has revealed he has not spoken to former co-host Jackie 'O' Henderson and demanded he be put back on the radio ahead of their joint court mention
Kyle Sandilands has revealed he has not spoken to former co-host Jackie ‘O’ Henderson and demanded he be put back on the radio ahead of their joint court mention
Pictured: Kyle Sandilands and Jackie 'O' Henderson at the KIIS 106.5 studio
Pictured: Kyle Sandilands and Jackie ‘O’ Henderson at the KIIS 106.5 studio

He said the dispute had become ‘pretty ugly’.

He said his message to ARN was to put him back on the radio.

Sandilands’ lawyer told the court the case could be heard as early as June.

He opposed the idea that both matters could be heard simultaneously, or concurrently, because Henderson’s case may take longer to prepare.

Any ‘unnecessary’ delay waiting for Henderson’s lawyers to prepare her case could result in further costs for Sandilands, and delay him potentially getting his job back.

Sandilands’ lawyer described KIIS 106.5 studios being like ‘Big Brother’ – where everything was recorded, whether or not it went to air.

The Kyle and Jackie O Show came to end and on February 20 following a on-air fight when Sandilands slammed Henderson for her ‘fixation’ on astrology, and then mocked her for crying.

Legal proceedings were launched when their combined $200million contracts were then terminated, with Henderson claiming ARN breached the Fair Work Act by failing to protect her from Sandilands’ alleged bullying.

Jackie 'O' Henderson is suing her former bosses at ARN over the termination of her $100million contract
Jackie ‘O’ Henderson is suing her former bosses at ARN over the termination of her $100million contract

Sandilands claims the radio giant wanted him to have a ‘dominant and abrasive personality’ while presenting the Kyle and Jackie O Show, and that his sacking was therefore invalid.

ARN has filed a counter claim in both matters, claiming the relationship breakdown threatens to undermine its profitability, and is seeking damages for breach of contract, losses in profit and advertising revenue, and legal costs.

Defence documents lodged by ARN in Henderson’s matter say Sandilands often made ‘offensive and degrading’ comments to her, but the broadcaster had ‘no ability or powers’ to stop him.

Henderson and Sandilands signed their contracts using their respective businesses, Henderson Media and Quasar. ARN claims those businesses were responsible for the welfare and conduct of the co‑hosts, rather than the broadcaster.

The radio giant’s defence also referred to a complaint from Henderson’s lawyers about Sandilands in the days following the February argument, stating she would not return to work until she was given an alternative radio show.

To ARN, that meant Henderson did not intend to return to work if there was no alternative show. ARN said it did not propose an alternative show because there was no obligation to do so.

ARN’s defence documents claim Sandilands breached the code of conduct in his agreement and listed about eight of his foul-mouthed rants – largely against ARN staff.

There was one instance in July where Sandilands berated a censor for dumping a portion of his show, which was done to avoid potentially getting dragged before a court and charged with contempt.

When his manager Bruno Bouchet said during the live broadcast that he didn’t want anyone going to jail, Sandilands replied, ‘I don’t give a s**t, before claiming he’d rather be sexually abused in jail than be muzzled by the law.

In another rant on April 30, Sandilands made a series of disparaging comments about Melbourne listeners, and ARN’s attempt to improve dismal ratings in the city.

Other rants included further attacks on the government and contempt laws, while continually firing off blistering attacks on his colleagues, calling them ‘p*ssies’ and ‘flops’, and threatening to leave ARN.

SOURCE: https://www.dailymail.com/tvshowbiz/article-15760743/kyle-sandilands.html